Showing posts with label California. Show all posts
Showing posts with label California. Show all posts

Friday, December 15, 2017

California Revision To Current IGP Proposed To Address TMDL and Monitoring

The California State Water Board has proposed amends to the Industrial General Permit (IGP) current in effect. Comments on the proposed amendments are due by January 31, 2018. The State Water Board is proposing the Amendment to the Statewide Storm Water Industrial General Permit (General Permit) to address the following items:
  • Implement TMDLs included in General Permit,
  • Update the monitoring requirements and
  • Add statewide compliance options to incentivize storm water capture and regional collaboration.


The current IGP includes a reopener to incorporate Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements through a future permit amendment (Section XX.A). The proposed General Permit Amendment incorporates requirements for implementing existing TMDLs adopted by the San Francisco Bay, Santa Ana, Los Angeles, and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Boards identifying industrial storm water as a source of the receiving water Impairment.


The proposed General Permit Amendment includes statewide compliance options to allow compliance with water quality objectives through onsite and regional storm water capture best management practices in place of typical compliance with numeric action levels and numeric effluent limitations.


In 2014, US EPA finalized the new Use of Sufficiently Sensitive Test Methods for Permit Applications and Reporting Rule for discharges regulated by NPDES permits. The new Rule became effective on September 18, 2014. The EPA Rule requires NPDES permitees to use “sufficiently sensitive” analytical test methods for the analyses of regulated pollutants or pollutants parameters. The proposed General Permit Amendment includes revised monitoring and reporting requirements for industrial storm water sampling consistent with the new Rule.


Click here to review other regulatory updates for California.

Monday, October 2, 2017

Warehousing and Logistics Facilities Needed Storm Water Permit And SWPPP


Caltha LLP Project Summary

Project: Industrial Storm Water Permitting & Compliance
Client: International Retailer
Location(s): California, Washington, Utah, Georgia, Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Massachusetts, New York, Kansas, Virginia, Louisiana, Texas, Tennessee, Minnesota, Illinois, Indiana, South Carolina, Colorado, Nevada, New Jersey, Connecticut, Missouri

Key Elements: SWPPP preparation, Stormwater monitoring, Compliance plan, Permit application

Overview: Caltha LLP has provided consulting services to this international retailer at multiple logistics and warehousing locations to comply with individual State industrial stormwater rules. Services included preparing facility stormwater pollution prevention plans, preparation of State or EPA application forms (Notice of Intent), preparation of site-specific inspection checklists to comply with individual State inspection requirements, preparation of site-specific stormwater monitoring and benchmark monitoring plans to meet State requirements applicable to this industrial sector. Caltha then provided ad hoc technical support to facilities to address questions during roll-out of the compliance programs.

Leaking Hydraulic System On Trash Compactor 
Contaminates Stormwater Discharge


For more information on Caltha LLP SWPPP services, go to the Environmental Health & Safety Plan | Spill Plan Information Request Form.


Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Updated Schedule For New California Industrial General Permit

According to the California State Water Board staff, the State Board anticipates a new 2013 Draft Industrial General Permit (IGP) and supporting documents to be released on or around July 20, 2013. Staff anticipate the State Water Board will provide at least 45 days for written comments to be submitted and during that window the State Water Board will hold a public hearing (tentatively scheduled for August 20, 2013) for oral comments to be provided on the new, draft requirements. Based on this schedule staff anticipate the State Water Board considering the IGP for adoption near the end of the year, 2013 or early 2014. Staff will recommend to the State Water Board an effective date for the new permit requirements to be about one year later, on January 1, 2015.

One on the key proposed changes from the existing permit under which many California facilities are currently covered is the requirement that storm water pollution prevention plans (SWPPP) be prepared by a Qualified SWPPP Developer, or QSD. Facilities will also have to designate a Qualified SWPPP Practitioner, or QSP, at the facility who will be responsible for implementing the SWPPP and overseeing ongoing compliance with the permit. Both QSDs and QSPs would have special training and certification requirements.

Read a Regulatory Briefing on the Draft California Industrial Permit

Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients in California and nationwide to address Stormwater Permitting & Regulatory Support, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), Stormwater Monitoring and Stormwater Training.

For further information contact Caltha LLP at
info@calthacompany.com or Caltha LLP Website

Thursday, February 14, 2013

California Industrial General Permit Reissuance Update

The California Water Board has released an update regarding the status of the State Water Board’s reissuance of the NPDES General Permit for the Discharge of Storm Water associated with Industrial Activities (Industrial General Permit, or IGP). State Water Board staff are currently working to address the comments received on the previous draft of the Industrial General Permit released on July 16, 2012 and expect to release a final draft of the Industrial General Permit by April 2013.  This final draft will be opened for a public comment period of least 45 days. The State Water Board also plans to hold a formal workshop on May 8, 2013, where the board will accept oral comments.

After the close of the public comment period staff expect to review the new comments, revise the permit as necessary, and queue it up the revised General permit for the State Water Board’s consideration during Summer 2013.

Read a summary of the California General Industrial Permit Issued in July 2012

Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address Stormwater Permitting & Regulatory Support, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), Stormwater Monitoring and Stormwater Training.
For further information contact Caltha LLP at info@calthacompany.com or Caltha LLP Website

Monday, August 27, 2012

Comment Period For California Industrial General Permit Extended

The California State Water Board has extended the deadline for written comments on the 2012 Draft IGP an additional 30 days. Thus, comments on the 2012 Draft NPDES Industrial General Permit may be submitted on or before 12:00 p.m. (Noon) on October 22, 2012.

The State Water Board still plans to conduct a public hearing to accept oral comments on October 17, 2012. A quorum of State Water Board members may be present at the public hearing; however, no board action will be taken. The time and location of the public hearing is:
Wednesday, 9:00 a.m. October 17, 2012
Joe Serna, Jr. Cal/EPA Building Coastal Hearing Room
1001 I Street, Second Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814

For a summary of the current draft permit, Click Here


Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address Stormwater Permitting & Regulatory Support, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), Stormwater Monitoring and Stormwater Training.

For further information contact Caltha LLP at info@calthacompany.com or Caltha LLP Website

Thursday, July 19, 2012

Preproduction Plastics Control Options Under California 2012 IGP

The revised California draft Industrial General Permit (IGP) includes controls required for pre-production plastic. Preproduction plastics used by the plastic manufacturing industry are small in size and have the potential to mobilize in storm water. Water Code section 13367 requires the State Water Board to implement measures that control discharges of preproduction plastic. Water Code section 13367 outlines five mandatory BMPs that are required for all facilities that handle preproduction plastic. These mandatory BMPs are included in the 2012 draft IGP.

The State Water Board had received comments regarding the Water Code requirements that plastic facilities to install a containment system for on-site storm drain locations that meet 1mm capture and 1-year 1-hour storm flow requirement standards. As a result, the 2012 IGP includes the option under Water Code section 13367 that allows a plastics facility to propose an alternative BMP or suite of BMPs that can meet the same performance and flow requirements as a 1mm capture and 1-year 1-hour storm flow containment system standards. These alternative BMPs are to be submitted to the Regional Water Board for approval. This alternative is intended to allow the facility to develop BMPs that focus on pollution prevention measures that can perform as well as, or better than, the containment system otherwise required by the statute.

The State Water Board also included two additional containment system alternatives that are considered to be equivalent to, or better than, the 1mm capture and 1-year 1-hour storm flow requirements:

  •  An alternative allowing plastic facilities to implement a suite of eight BMPs addressing the majority of potential sources of plastic discharges.
  • An alternative allowing a facility to operate in a manner such that all preproduction plastic materials are used indoors and pose no potential threat for discharge off-site.

The facility is required to notify the Regional Water Board of the intent to seek this exemption and of any changes to the facility or operations that may disqualify the facility for the exemption. The exemption may be revoked by the Regional Water Board at any time.

Plastic facilities may use preproduction plastic materials that are less than 1mm in size, or produce materials, byproducts, or waste that is smaller than 1mm in size. These materials will bypass the 1mm capture containment system required by Water Code section 13367. Plastic facilities with sub-1mm materials must design a containment system to capture the smallest size material onsite with a 1-year 1-hour storm flow requirement, or propose alternative BMPs for Regional Water Board approval that meet these same requirements.


Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address Stormwater Permitting and Regulatory Support, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), Stormwater Monitoring and Stormwater Training.

For further information contact Caltha LLP at info@calthacompany.com or Caltha LLP Website

Cost Analysis For Compliance With Revised Industrial Permit

The California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) has released its cost analysis comparing estimated costs associated with the current Industrial General Permit (ICP), the draft revised permit issued in 2011, and the draft revised permit issued in July 2012. The purpose of the analysis is to provide an estimate of the compliance costs associated with the State Water Board’s Statewide General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Industrial Activity (IGP).

Read a summary of the 2012 California IGP: http://www.calthacompany.com/Draft_California_Industrial_Stormwater_Permit_Summary.pdf

The key finding of the report are that the average annual cost of compliance of the 2012 permit for facilities with no exceedances would increase between 5% and 12% compared to the annual cost of compliance with the 1997 IGP. Annual average cost of compliance with the new permit depends on multiple factors including size of operations, location, and level of exceedances. Staff estimated annual compliance costs for the 1997 IGP to range between $23,000 to approximately $137,000. For facilities with no exceedances, compliance with the 2012 draft will cost between $25,000 and approximately $155,000 annually.

The increase in compliance costs would be more significant for those facilities with exceedances. Staff does not expect a significant increase in compliance costs for those facilities with no exceedances. Facilities with exceedances would see a more significant increase in costs to bring the facility in compliance. Facilities with Level 1 status (one NAL exceedance) would face an additional annual average cost between $97 and $622. Facilities with Level 2 status (second NAL exceedance for same parameter) would face an additional annual average cost between $1,138 and up to $38,641.

The annual average cost of compliance with the 2012 draft is approximately half (50% less) of what the 2011 draft originally required. Based on Water Board staff’s best judgment, the most likely scenario is that 50% of facilities will have no exceedances, 50% of facilities will reach Level 1, and 25% will reach Level 2. Using this assumption, the total annual average compliance costs of the 2012 draft as compared to the 1997 IGP would be increased by approximately 7% for industry as a whole.

The most commented upon elements of the draft 2011 IGP were the proposed numeric effluent limitations (NELs), the increased number of reportable inspections and/or visual observations, and the compulsory training requirements. In response to these comments, NELs have been eliminated, revisions and clarification were made so that the number of inspections and visual observations are the same as the 1997 IGP (with the exception of pre-storm visual observations), and the compulsory training requirement has been simplified. Additionally, a new ERA system has been proposed that (1) more narrowly focuses on those facilities with the highest concentrations of pollutants, and (2) allows dischargers to avoid costly structural or treatment controls if it is proven that the pollutant concentrations are related to non-industrial sources, natural background conditions, or if the facility is already in compliance with BAT/BCT.


Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address Stormwater Permitting and Regulatory Support, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), Stormwater Monitoring and Stormwater Training.

For further information contact Caltha LLP at info@calthacompany.com or Caltha LLP Website

No Exposure Certification Under Proposed California General Permit

Phase II of the Federal stormwater rules changed the requirement for “no exposure certification” or NEC which existed in 1997, then the current California general permit was finalized. EPA extended the option to certify no exposure to any industrial sector. The draft IGP applies US EPA’s Phase II rules regarding a conditional exclusion for facilities where there is no exposure of industrial activities and materials to storm water. The previous California permit mandated that light industries obtain coverage only if their activities were exposed to storm water. This General Permit meets US EPA rules allowing any type of industry to claim the conditional exclusion.

In the draft IGP, the NEC requires enrollment for coverage but conditionally excludes dischargers from a majority of the permit requirements. Some minor modifications were added to clarify the types of “storm resistant shelters” and the periods when “temporary shelters” may be used to meet the NEC requirements. Under the draft ICP, dischargers meeting all the NEC would need to recertify each year.

Facilities that self-certified no exposure under the previous permit (category 11) are required to designate a Legally Responsible Person (LRP) to certify and submit via SMARTS for NOI or NEC coverage under this General Permit. NEC will need to be recertified through SMARTS on an annual basis.

Click here for a summary of the Draft California Industrial Storm Water Permit

Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address Stormwater Permitting and Regulatory Support, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), Stormwater Monitoring and Stormwater Training.

For further information contact Caltha LLP at info@calthacompany.com or Caltha LLP Website

Proposed California Industrial Storm Water General Permit Released

In July 16, 2012, the California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) published its third draft of its proposed “General Permit For Storm Water Discharges Associated With Industrial Activities, NPDES No. CAS000001” or “IGP”. This permit covers stormwater discharges from certain types of industrial and “industrial-like” operations that are required to have a stormwater discharge NPDES permit.

NPDES permits, including general permits, are typically reissued on a 5- year cycle. However, the current IGP has been in effect since 1997.

The proposed permit includes numerous significant changes to the compliance requirements in California. These changes are in response to new Federal requirements for industrial stormwater discharges (most notably the 2008 EPA Multisector General Permit, or MSGP), changes recommended by State Water Board staff, recommendations from a “blue ribbon panel of experts” convened in 2005-2006, and several court actions.

Read a Regulatory Briefing on the Draft California Industrial Permit

Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address Stormwater Permitting and Regulatory Support, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), Stormwater Monitoring and Stormwater Training.

For further information contact Caltha LLP at info@calthacompany.com or Caltha LLP Website

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Update On Reissue Of California Industrial Stormwater Discharge General Permit

UPDATE: On July 16, 2012, an updated draft was released. Click here for a summary of the revised draft ICP

The California State Water Board posted a revise draft industrial stormwater general permit in January 2011 and accepted public comments through April 2011. The Board is working to address the comments received on the previous draft.

The California State Water Board currently expects to release a new draft of the industrial permit and its attachments and supporting documents in early 2012. The Board anticipates at least a 60 day comment period, during which they plan to provide at least two, informal staff workshops and one, formal public hearing.

Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address Stormwater Permitting & Regulatory Support, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), Stormwater Monitoring and Stormwater Training.



For further information contact Caltha LLP at
info@calthacompany.com or Caltha LLP Website

Friday, July 29, 2011

Update On Reissue of California Industrial General Permit For Stormwater

UPDATE: On July 16, 2012, an updated draft was released. Click here for a summary of the revised draft ICP

On January 28, 2011, the California Water Board released a draft Industrial Activities Storm Water General Permit (IGP) for public comment. State Water Board staff are working on a new draft of the California industrial permit based on the comments received on the January 28, 2011, draft IGP. Currently the Water Board plans to release the new draft IGP before September 1, 2011. The Board expects to post the new draft IGP along with a hearing notice prior to September 1, 2011.

At the present time the California Water Board anticipates they will schedule a hearing for the new draft IGP in October or November of 2011.
Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address Stormwater Permitting & Regulatory Support, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), Stormwater Monitoring and Stormwater Training.



For further information contact Caltha LLP at
info@calthacompany.com or Caltha LLP Website

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Qualified SWPPP Developer & Qualified SWPPP Practitioner Requirements Under Draft California Permit

UPDATE: On July 16, 2012, an updated draft was released. Click here for a summary of the revised draft ICP

On January 28, 2011, the California State Water Resources Control Board released its draft General Permit for stormwater discharges associated with industrial activities. The draft NPDES permit proposes several changes from the existing California General Permit.

One of the important changes will be especially significant for facilities that have in the past prepared their own stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP). Under the proposed permit, all dischargers will need to appoint a Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) to prepare, write, and make any revisions to the SWPPP, and appoint a Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP) to help implement the SWPPP.

The minimum requirements to become a certified Qualified SWPPP Developer includes have one of the following registrations for certifications, and appropriate experience, as required for:

  • California registered professional civil engineer;
  • California registered professional geologist or engineering geologist;
  • California registered landscape architect;
  • Professional hydrologist registered through the American Institute of Hydrology;
In addition, the QSD must successfully complete the State Water Board-sponsored or approved QSD training course within one year after the effective date of this General Permit.

Unless a facility has a registered engineer, geologist, landscape artitict, or professional hydrologist on staff, facilities subject to the permit will need to contract outside professional services to prepare, certify and update the SWPPP.

The minimum requirement to become a certified Qualified SWPPP Practitioner is to successfully complete the State Water Board-sponsored or approved QSP training course within one year from the effective date of the General Permit.
Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address Stormwater Permitting & Regulatory Support, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), Stormwater Monitoring and Stormwater Training.
For further information contact Caltha LLP at
info@calthacompany.com or Caltha LLP Website

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Numeric Action Levels, Numeric Effluent Limits, and Corrective Action Triggers In California Draft Permit

UPDATE: On July 16, 2012, an updated draft was released. Click here for a summary of the revised draft ICP

On January 28, 2011, the California State Water Resources Control Board proposed a draft industrial stormwater discharge general permit. The draft General Permit amends a number of the existing requirements for permitted facilities and adds some new requirements.

One of the more significant changes to the California General NPDES Permit is the incorporation of quantitative Action Levels and Effluent Limits which could apply to any discharger:


Numeric Action Levels (NALs) are derived from the US EPA Multi-Sector General Permit’s benchmarks, and are used as numeric thresholds for corrective action. Exceedances of an NAL are not a violation of the permit; however, exceedance of specific NAL Corrective Action Triggers requires the facility to enter into Level 1 Corrective Action.

[More information on US EPA benchmarks, and comparison to historic industrial sector monitoring results]


Numeric Effluent Limits (NELs) are could also apply to any facility. Dischargers in Corrective Action Level 3 (see below) are subject to a numeric effluent limitation (NEL) that will be the same value as the applicable pollutant NAL. A daily average exceedance of the NEL is a violation of the General Permit and may subject the discharger to mandatory minimum penalties.

NAL Corrective Action Triggers are defined in the draft general permit as follows:
1. The Daily Average (DA) for any one constituent exceeds the NAL value for two or more storm events of a reporting year, or;
2. The DA for any two constituents exceed the NAL values for any single storm event within a reporting year, or;
3. The concentration for any one constituent exceeds 2.5 times the NAL value for any one individual or allowable combined sample (or is more than one pH unit outside the NAL pH range)

In the event that any of the NAL Corrective Action Triggers are met, the facility will need to complete Level 1 Corrective Actions. The need to do further corrective actions will depend on subsequent monitoring results.


Level 1 - Operational Source Control Corrective ActionsUpon the first occurrence meeting any of the NAL corrective action triggers, the discharger will be required to valuate areas of the facility to identify where additional operational source control BMPs and/or SWPPP implementation measures are necessary to prevent or reduce pollutants in storm water discharges in compliance with BAT/BCT. Based upon the facility evaluation, the facility will certify that the pollutant source(s) have been identified and 1) additional operational source control BMPs and/or SWPPP implementation measures have been included in the SWPPP , 2) no additional operational source control BMPs or SWPPP implementation measures are required , or 3) pollutant source(s) causing the exceedance are not related to the facility’s industrial activities. A Level 1 NAL Exceedance Evaluation Report will need to be prepared and submitted.
Level 2 Structural and/or Treatment Corrective ActionsIf in any subsequent reporting year the sampling results meet an NAL corrective action trigger, the discharger is require to take addition action. If the NAL corrective action trigger is for a constituent that had not been included in a previous Level 1 NAL Exceedance Evaluation Report, the discharger go through Level 1 Corrective Actions.
If the NAL corrective action trigger is for one or more of the constituents previously addressed in a Level 1 NAL Exceedance Evaluation Report, the discharger would need to evaluate and select additional structural source control BMPs and/or treatment BMPs with the goal of achieving the applicable NAL value(s) in future discharges. A Level 2 NAL Exceedance Evaluation Report will need to be prepared and submitted and more frequent monitoring is required.
Level 3 Imposition of Numeric Effluent LimitsIf in any subsequent reporting year the sampling results meet an NAL corrective action trigger for the same constituents subject to the Level 2 corrective actions, the discharger shall the applicable NAL(s) will become an NEL(s), and starting October 1 of the following compliance year, the discharger will be required to sample every qualifying storm event.

Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address Stormwater Permitting & Regulatory Support, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), Stormwater Monitoring and Stormwater Training.

For further information contact Caltha LLP at
info@calthacompany.comorCaltha LLP Website

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Fee Increase For California Storm Water Permits

The California State Water Resources Control Board is considering emergency measures that will result in a significant increase the fees charged to stormwater permittees.

According to the State Board, the increase is needed to respond to both reductions in revenue generated and increased program costs. The shortfall in revenue is a result of under-collection of revenue in the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) in FY 2009-10 and a substantial drop in enrollment under the State Water Board’s recently adopted storm water construction permit. In July 2009, the State Water Board adopted Order 2009-0009-DWQ requiring storm water construction dischargers to enroll in a new storm water construction permit by July 1, 2010. Approximately 64 % of previous storm water construction permit holders did not renew their permits by the deadline and have been terminated from coverage. Many of these permittees did not reenroll because of a decline in construction activity. At the same time, the downturn in the construction industry has resulted in a reduction of the number of new permits being issued.

During the same period, costs increased substantially due to a shift in funding for basin planning from General Fund support to fee support and a return to full payroll costs due to the discontinuance of the furlough program.

According to the State Board, the Storm Water program needs to generate an additional $4.4 million in revenue to meet the FY 2010-11 Budget, which translates to a 21.5 % increase to all Storm Water fee categories.

Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address Stormwater Permitting & Regulatory Support, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), Stormwater Monitoring and Stormwater Training.

For further information contact Caltha LLP at info@calthacompany.com or Caltha LLP Website

Monday, May 10, 2010

Preproduction Plastic Debris Program In California

Update: Preproduction Plastic controls are added to 2012 draft industrial general permit: http://swppp.calthacompany.com/2012/07/preproduction-plastics-control-options.html


In 2007, Assembly Bill (AB) 258 was passed, and became effective January 1, 2008, which added Chapter 5.2 to Division 7 of the California Water Code, section 13367. Chapter 5.2 entitled “Preproduction Plastic Debris Program”. This law applies to facilities in California that manufacture, handle, or transport preproduction plastics.

Preproduction plastic is the raw plastic resin materials that are molded into finished plastic products. Preproduction plastics are often produced in a resin pellet format, occasionally termed as “nurdles.” These small, 1- to 5- mm diameter pieces are produced in various shapes, colors, and plastic types. Preproduction plastic resins are also produced in powder, granule, and flake form.

Once in the environment, preproduction plastic resin pellets, powders, and production scrap can be mistaken for food by marine life. They also contribute to California’s litter problem, which state and local agencies spend millions of dollars per year on collecting. Preproduction plastic discharges pose a significant threat to California’s marine environment, which is an important part of California's $46-billion dollar ocean-dependent, tourism economy.

State and Regional Water Board staff have conducted and are continuing to conduct compliance inspections of various types and scales of preproduction plastic manufacturing, handling, and transport facilities enrolled under California's Industrial General Permit (IGP) for storm water discharges. Additionally, the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board has conducted inspections of facilities suspected to be "non-filers," or facilities subject to the permit, but have not enrolled.

The State Water Board has issued an investigative order to all plastic-related facilities enrolled under the IGP to conduct a Self-Compliance Evaluation and to provide the State Water Board with information needed to satisfy the legislative mandates in AB 258. Facilities subject to this order must complete an online evaluation and assess their points of potential preproduction plastics discharge and means of controlling these discharges.

Caltha LLP provides expert consulting services to public and private sector clients nationwide to address Stormwater Permitting & Regulatory Support, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), Stormwater Monitoring and Stormwater Training.
For further information contact Caltha LLP at

info@calthacompany.com
or
Caltha LLP Website

Saturday, January 10, 2009

SWPPP Training – Stormwater Training

Caltha LLP offers a wide variety of SWPPP Training courses developed to meet the requirements of individual States. Separate stormwater training programs are provided to Industrial, Municipal (MS4) and Construction stormwater dischargers.

Training is offered in a number of flexible formats, ranging from traditional classroom training presented periodically in different locations, to facility-level training conducted at individual sites to meet employee and/or contractor training needs. Caltha offers web-based and remote training options. Caltha also creates facility-specific training materials and conducts “train-the-trainer” sessions for facility training staff.

Caltha also offers stormwater training options especially designed for small groups or small organizations.

Caltha provides State-specific SWPPP training for the following States:
[Click on a State to request information on upcoming stormwater training programs and training options]

[See a map showing States where Caltha LLP worked in 2008]

Alabama
Arkansas
California
Connecticut
Florida
Georgia
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Nebraska
Nevada
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Washington
Wisconsin


Tuesday, December 2, 2008

California Stormwater Permitting Program Temporarly Shut Down By Court Order

In July 2008, court actions in California effectively shut down a large portion of the State's stormwater permitting program, leaving many new dischargers without a viable means of obtaining a stormwater discharge permit. This impacted new industrial dischargers; however the most significant impact was on new construction sites.

On July 2, 2008, the Orange County Superior Court issued a Writ of Mandate ordering the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) to a cease, desist and suspend all activities relating to the implementation, application, and/or enforcement of the Standards in the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board's Basin Plan, as applied or to be applied to Stormwater. This injunction prohibited the approval of Notices of Intent (NOIs) in the Los Angeles Region under the Statewide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Construction, Small Linear Utility, and Industrial Storm Water General Permits.

The State Water Board and Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board immediately stopped enrolling dischargers, processing NOIs, and assigning Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) numbers for activities in the Los Angeles Region. Applications (NOIs) received in July were rejected. This action did not eliminate the regulatory obligation to obtain a stormwater discharge permit. Therefore, new dischargers who were not already covered under the permit were not able to obtain coverage under the general permit.

On August 1, 2008, the Orange County Superior Court issued an order limiting the effect of a Writ of Mandate, and allowing the processing of Notices of Intent (NOIs) and Notices of Termination (NOTs). Dischargers with rejected NOIs were instructed to resubmit their NOI to the State Water Board with the applicable fee and a WDID Number would be assigned as soon as possible.


For further information contact Caltha LLP at
info@calthacompany.com
or
Caltha LLP Website